Switch to ADA Accessible Theme
Close Menu
The Law Offices of Stanley L. Friedman
White Collar Criminal Defense 310-598-2000
Home / Resources / Defense Strategies in Healthcare Fraud Cases

Defense Strategies in Healthcare Fraud Cases

Healthcare fraud is a complex and serious offense that can result in severe penalties, including hefty fines, lengthy prison sentences, the loss of a professional license, exclusion from federal programs, and more. For those accused of such crimes, having a robust defense strategy is crucial. At The Law Offices of Stanley L. Friedman, we specialize in defending individuals and entities against healthcare fraud charges in California. Below, we discuss common defense strategies often used in healthcare fraud cases, including lack of intent, entrapment, and insufficient evidence. For personalized advice and representation tailored to your specific case, contact The Law Offices of Stanley L. Friedman to review your case with an experienced and successful Los Angeles healthcare fraud defense lawyer.

Lack of Intent

One of the most effective defenses in healthcare fraud cases is demonstrating a lack of intent. Healthcare fraud typically involves allegations of knowingly and willfully executing or attempting to execute a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program. Demonstrating that the accused did not have the intention to commit fraud can be pivotal.

  • Honest Mistakes: Errors in billing, coding, or documentation can often be attributed to honest mistakes rather than intentional fraud. By presenting evidence of compliance efforts and the complexity of medical billing, the defense can argue that any inaccuracies were unintentional.
  • Lack of Knowledge: The defense can argue that the defendant was unaware that their actions were fraudulent. For example, a healthcare provider might not have known that certain billing practices were inappropriate due to the ambiguous or confusing nature of regulations.


Entrapment occurs when law enforcement officials induce a person to commit a crime they would not have otherwise committed. This defense is particularly relevant in cases where undercover operations or sting operations are involved.

  • Government Inducement: The defense could show that the government agents initiated the idea of committing fraud and persuaded the defendant to participate in the illegal activity.
  • Lack of Predisposition: For an effective entrapment defense, it must also be demonstrated that the defendant was not predisposed to commit the crime. Evidence of a clean record, lack of prior fraudulent activity, and character witnesses can support this claim.

Insufficient Evidence

Another common and effective defense involves challenging the sufficiency of the evidence presented by the prosecution. In a criminal case, the burden of proof lies with the government, which must establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

  • Questionable Witnesses: The credibility of witnesses, particularly those who may have motives to lie, such as disgruntled employees or competitors, can be challenged. Cross-examination can reveal inconsistencies or biases in their testimonies.
  • Documentary Evidence: The defense can scrutinize the documentary evidence presented, such as billing records and patient files, to highlight discrepancies or lack of direct linkage to the defendant.
  • Expert Testimony: Hiring expert witnesses to testify on the complexities of healthcare billing and coding can help cast doubt on the prosecution’s interpretation of the evidence.

Statute of Limitations

The statute of limitations is the maximum period within which legal proceedings must be initiated. For healthcare fraud cases, this period is typically five years from the date of the alleged offense.

  • Timely Filing: If the charges are brought after the statute of limitations has expired, the defense can move to have the case dismissed on these grounds.
  • Discovery Rule: In some cases, the statute of limitations may be extended if the fraud was not discovered immediately. The defense can argue that the prosecution’s delay in discovery was unreasonable.

Good Faith

Good faith is another powerful defense in healthcare fraud cases. It revolves around the defendant’s belief that they were acting within the law and in accordance with industry standards.

  • Compliance Programs: Evidence that the defendant had implemented and adhered to comprehensive compliance programs can support a good faith defense. This includes training staff, conducting regular audits, and correcting any identified issues promptly.
  • Legal Advice: Demonstrating that the defendant sought and followed legal or professional advice regarding billing practices and regulatory compliance can further substantiate the claim of good faith.

Contact The Law Offices of Stanley L. Friedman for Zealous and Effective Healthcare Fraud Defense in California

Defending against healthcare fraud charges requires a nuanced understanding of both the legal landscape and the healthcare industry. At The Law Offices of Stanley L. Friedman, we leverage our extensive experience in healthcare fraud defense to develop tailored strategies that challenge the prosecution’s case at every turn. Making the most of all applicable defenses, we are dedicated to protecting our clients’ rights and achieving the best possible outcomes.

If you or your organization is facing healthcare fraud allegations, it is imperative to seek skilled legal representation immediately. Call us today at 310-598-2000 for a confidential consultation to discuss your case and explore your defense options.

Share This Page:
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn